Chapter 11: Managing Pricing and Sales Promotions
IPMX Marketing Management โ Comprehensive Study Notes
๐ Chapter Overview
Opening Case: Netflix โ Founded 1997; grew to 74M US subscribers + 210M worldwide. Challenge: rising content costs while maintaining value perception. Strategy: tiered pricing (Basic $8.99 / Standard $10.99 / Premium $15.99); India: mobile-only โน199 plan + partnership with Jio for free subscription to postpaid customers. CEO Hastings: "Price is all relative to value... we're continuing to increase content offering." Result: 14% OTT market share in India by July 2021.
Critical distinction: Price is the ONE element of the marketing mix that produces REVENUE. All others produce COSTS.
๐ง Key Concept: What Price Is
Price comes in many forms: rent, tuition, fares, fees, rates, tolls, retainers, wages, commissions.
Historical context: Fixed prices emerged only in late 19th century with large-scale retailing (F.W. Woolworth, Tiffany & Co.). Before: everything was negotiated.
Internet revolution in pricing:
- Buyers: instant price comparison; pool resources (Groupon); bid in auctions
- Sellers: monitor demand; adjust prices dynamically; offer customized promotions based on profile
๐ท Framework 1: Common Pricing Mistakes
- Setting prices based only on cost (cost-plus thinking)
- Not revising prices frequently enough to capitalize on market changes
- Setting prices independently of the rest of the marketing program
- Not varying prices enough across segments, channels, and occasions
๐ท Framework 2: Consumer Psychology and Pricing
Reference Prices
Consumers compare observed prices to internal reference points. Types:
- "Fair price" (what it should cost)
- Typical price (what it usually costs)
- Last price paid
- Upper-bound price (reservation price โ maximum willingness to pay)
- Lower-bound price (threshold โ minimum for acceptable quality)
- Competitor prices
- Expected future price
- Usual discounted price
Managerial use: Sellers manipulate reference prices by:
- Situating product among expensive competitors
- Displaying a high "was" price alongside the current price
- Indicating competitor's high price
Warning: "Unpleasant surprises" (price higher than expected) have GREATER negative impact on purchase likelihood than pleasant surprises have positive impact.
Price framing: "$600 annual membership" feels less than "$50 per month" even though they're equal. Breaking into smaller units reduces perceived expense.
Image Pricing
Price as a quality indicator โ especially for ego-sensitive products: perfumes, cars, designer clothing.
Ferrari effect: Deliberately limits production below demand to maintain exclusivity and justify premium.
Pabst Blue Ribbon in China: US budget beer repositioned as premium ($44/bottle) by claiming "matured in precious wooden cask like Scotch whiskey" โ same product, completely different positioning.
Pricing Cues
- Odd-number endings ($299 vs $300): Customers perceive $299 as "$200-range" not "$300-range" โ "left-to-right" processing
- "9" endings suggest discount/bargain โ for premium positioning, AVOID this cue
- One study: demand increased when dress price rose from $34 to $39 (bargain signal) but was unchanged when rising from $34 to $44
- "Sale" signs increase demand but only if not overused โ total sales highest when SOME (not all) items have sale signs
- Pricing cues are MORE influential when: price knowledge is poor, infrequent purchase, product designs vary over time, prices vary seasonally
๐ท Framework 3: The 6-Step Price-Setting Process
Step 1: Define Pricing Objective
โ
Step 2: Determine Demand
โ
Step 3: Estimate Costs
โ
Step 4: Analyze Competitors' Prices
โ
Step 5: Select Pricing Method
โ
Step 6: Set the Final Price
Step 1: Define Pricing Objective
| Objective | How Price is Set | When Used |
|---|---|---|
| Short-term profit maximization | Maximize current profit/ROI | When firm knows demand and cost functions well |
| Market penetration | Very low price โ maximize volume โ lower costs | Price-sensitive market; discourages competition |
| Market skimming | High price โ "skim cream" off high-WTP buyers | New technology; sufficient buyers at high price; high price โ more competition |
| Quality leadership | High price + heavy R&D investment to maintain quality | Starbucks, BMW, Aveda |
Penetration conditions (all 3 must hold):
- Market is highly price sensitive
- Production/distribution costs fall with accumulated experience
- Low price discourages actual and potential competition
Skimming conditions:
- Sufficient buyers signal high current demand
- High initial price doesn't attract more competitors
- High price communicates image of superior product
Step 2: Determining Demand
Price Elasticity of Demand: = % change in quantity / % change in price
- Inelastic demand: Small price change โ little quantity change (price elasticity < 1)
- Elastic demand: Small price change โ large quantity change (price elasticity > 1)
Figure 11.1 (Inelastic vs Elastic):
- Inelastic: $10โ$15 price increase โ only 100 to 105 unit drop
- Elastic: $10โ$15 price increase โ 150 to 50 unit drop
Academic finding: Average price elasticity across all products, markets, time periods = -2.62. Meaning: 1% price decrease leads to 2.62% sales increase.
When demand is inelastic (price elasticity is LOW):
- Product is distinctive with few/no substitutes
- Consumers don't readily notice price increase
- Consumers are slow to change buying habits
- Consumers think higher price is justified (scarcity, quality, taxation)
- Expenditure is small % of buyer's total income
- Part or all of cost borne by another party
Long-run vs Short-run elasticity: Often differs. Buyers may stick with supplier after price increase initially but switch later (more elastic long-run). Or drop supplier then return (less elastic long-run).
Step 3: Estimating Costs
Fixed costs: Don't vary with production/sales (rent, heat, interest, salaries) Variable costs: Vary directly with production level (materials per unit = constant per unit, but total varies) Total cost = Fixed + Variable Average cost = Total cost / Production units
Experience Curve (Learning Curve):
- Average cost falls with accumulated production experience
- Workers learn shortcuts โ materials flow more smoothly โ procurement costs fall
Example (Samsung tablet):
- 100,000 units produced: avg cost = $100
- 200,000 units produced: avg cost = $90 (experience doubles)
- 400,000 units produced: avg cost = $80
Experience-curve pricing strategy (and risks):
- Price low to gain volume โ falls along curve โ competitors exit
- Risk: Can give product a "cheap image"; assumes competitors are weak; may lead to capacity overinvestment when competitor innovates cheaper technology
Activity-based cost accounting: Needed to estimate real profitability per customer/retailer type โ goes beyond standard manufacturing cost accounting.
Step 4: Analyzing Competitors' Costs, Prices, Offers
- If your offer has features the competitor lacks โ add their worth to competitor's price โ set your price higher
- If competitor has features you lack โ subtract their worth from your price
- The goal: position your price so customers understand the value differential
Value players disrupting incumbents: Aldi, Lidl, JetBlue, Southwest Airlines โ high quality + low price combination threatens traditional players. Key: serve one/few segments + highly efficient operations.
"Set up low-cost operations only if (1) existing businesses become more competitive as a result, and (2) new business derives synergy advantages."
Continental "Lite" and United's "Ted" โ failed due to lack of synergies. ING Direct, First Direct โ succeeded through synergies with parent.
Step 5: Selecting a Pricing Method
The Three-Cs framework:
- Costs โ set the FLOOR
- Competitors/substitutes โ provide an ORIENTING POINT
- Customers' assessment of unique features โ establish the CEILING
5 Pricing Methods
1) Markup (Cost-Plus) Pricing:
Unit Cost = Variable Cost + (Fixed Cost / Unit Sales)
= $10 + ($300,000 / 50,000) = $10 + $6 = $16
Markup Price = Unit Cost / (1 - Desired Return on Sales)
= $16 / (1 - 0.20) = $16 / 0.80 = $20
Why markup pricing persists despite ignoring demand:
- Sellers can estimate costs more easily than demand
- When all firms use it, price competition is minimized
- Perceived as "fair" โ buyer and seller both get reasonable return
2) Target-Rate-of-Return Pricing:
Target-Return Price = Unit Cost + (Desired Return ร Invested Capital / Unit Sales)
= $16 + (0.20 ร $1,000,000 / 50,000) = $16 + $4 = $20
Break-Even Volume = Fixed Cost / (Price - Variable Cost)
= $300,000 / ($20 - $10) = 30,000 units
(See Figure 11.2: Break-Even Chart showing total revenue crossing total cost at 30,000 units)
Limitation: Ignores customer demand and competitor prices.
3) Economic-Value-to-Customer (EVC) Pricing: = Price based on customer's perceived economic value = Buyer's image of product performance + channel deliverables + warranty quality + customer support + supplier reputation
Caterpillar Example:
- Competitor tractor: $90,000
- Caterpillar justified $100,000 (after $10,000 discount from $110,000) through:
- $7,000 premium for superior durability
- $6,000 for superior reliability
- $5,000 for superior service
- $2,000 for longer warranty = Customer actually gets $20,000 MORE value while paying only $10,000 premium
Key: Customers must actually perceive this value โ requires communication and education.
4) Competitive Pricing (Going-Rate): = Price based largely on competitors' prices
- Industry standard in commodities (steel, paper, fertilizer)
- Small firms "follow the leader" rather than own cost/demand changes
- Small premium/discount maintained but not fluctuated based on own costs
5) Auction-Type Pricing:
- English (ascending bids): One seller, many buyers; highest bid wins (eBay, antiques, real estate)
- Dutch (descending bids): Auctioneer starts high, decreases until someone accepts; OR buyer announces need, sellers compete on lowest price (SAP Ariba B2B)
- Sealed-bid auctions: Suppliers submit one blind bid; government contracts; bid above cost but not so high as to lose the job; "expected profit" = bid ร probability of winning
Step 6: Setting the Final Price
Price discrimination = Selling at 2+ prices not reflecting proportional cost differences.
| Type | Definition | Example |
|---|---|---|
| First-degree | Charge each customer their personal max WTP | Custom negotiations |
| Second-degree | Less for larger volumes | Airlines, cell phones (though some charge MORE with higher usage) |
| Third-degree | Different prices to different segments | โ See below |
Third-Degree Price Discrimination Types:
- Customer-segment: Museums: lower for students/seniors; Orbitz showed Mac users more expensive hotels
- Product-form: Evian: $1 for 2-liter bottle vs $12 for 5-oz moisturizer spray
- Channel: Coca-Cola at fine restaurant vs fast-food vs vending machine
- Location: Theater seat pricing by audience preference
- Time: "Early bird" discounts; Valentine's Day roses surge 200%
Conditions for price discrimination to work:
- Market is segmentable AND segments show different demand intensities
- Lower-price segment cannot resell to higher-price segment
- Competitors cannot undersell the firm in the higher-price segment
- Cost of segmenting/policing must not exceed extra revenue
- Must not breed customer resentment
Yield Management: Airlines/hotels/cruise lines offer discounted early purchases, higher late prices, lowest just-before-expiry rates. Example: same NYC-Miami flight, some pay $200, others $1,290.
Dynamic Pricing: Online merchants on Amazon change prices hourly or by the minute to secure top search placement.
๐ Figure 11.1: Inelastic vs Elastic Demand
(From textbook page 15)
Inelastic: steep demand curve โ price increase from $10โ$15 moves quantity only from 105โ100. Elastic: flat demand curve โ same price increase moves quantity from 150โ50.
๐ก Groupon Case Study
- Launched 2008 to help businesses use internet promotions as advertising
- Sends subscribers daily deals (% or $ off regular price)
- Firm gets: increased consumer exposure + ability to price-discriminate + "buzz factor"
- Groupon takes 40-50% of revenue from each deal
- Study results: 32% of companies LOST money; 40% wouldn't use again; restaurants fared worst; spas/salons most successful
- Groupon Now: local time/location-specific deals via smartphone; "I'm Bored" and "I'm Hungry" buttons
- Core problem: attracts deal-seekers, not regular customers
โ Common Mistakes
- Ignoring price psychology โ Not using reference prices, image pricing, or pricing cues strategically
- Treating price as independent โ Price must align with positioning and rest of marketing mix
- Cost-only pricing โ Missing the ceiling (customer value) and the orienting point (competition)
- Not varying prices enough โ Leaving money on the table from high-WTP customers; not capturing cost savings from serving different segments
- Price wars โ Usually destroy value for everyone; better to differentiate and escape commodity trap
- Raising prices without value justification โ Customers notice and resent it
๐ Quick Revision
Price psychology: Reference prices | Image pricing | Pricing cues (odd endings, "9" signals discount)
6-Step process: Objective โ Demand โ Costs โ Competitor analysis โ Method โ Final price
Pricing objectives: Profit maximization | Market penetration | Market skimming | Quality leadership
Pricing methods: Markup | Target-rate-of-return | Economic value to customer | Competitive | Auction
Price floor = costs; Ceiling = customer value; Orienting point = competitors
Price elasticity average = -2.62 (1% drop โ 2.62% volume increase)
Price discrimination types: 1st degree (individual) / 2nd degree (volume) / 3rd degree (segment)
๐ฏ Self-Quiz Questions
- Netflix raised prices multiple times. Why did customers largely accept these increases?
- Calculate the markup price if: variable cost = $15, fixed costs = $450,000, expected sales = 30,000 units, desired markup = 25% on sales.
- When is market skimming preferable to market penetration? Give two conditions for each.
- Why did Groupon fail to retain business clients? What should they have done differently?
- A luxury car brand priced at $95,000 faces a competitor at $85,000. Using EVC pricing logic, how would you defend the $10,000 premium?
- Under what conditions does price discrimination work legally and economically?
- Explain the experience curve and its pricing implications โ including the risks.
๐งช Exam Tips
- Formulas must be memorized: Markup price; Target-return price; Break-even volume
- Three-Cs = Floor/Orienting point/Ceiling โ Use this structure to organize any pricing analysis
- Price discrimination conditions are frequently tested โ Know all 5 conditions
- "Elasticity is low when..." โ Memorize the 6 conditions for exam
- Figure 11.1 (inelastic vs elastic) may appear in MCQ or short-answer โ know the visual distinction
- Netflix/Caterpillar cases are perfect for essay questions on pricing strategy and value communication